[ad_1]
Assignment – PWS Component IV – Implementation of Plan
For weeks 4-6, you implemented your Transition Support Plan (TSP) that you designed during weeks 1-3. This is Component IV of your TSP. During your implementation you should have noted strengths and weaknesses of your plan and made any needed adjustments as appropriate. You should have also progress monitored student performance data that informed your instructional decision making. These past 3 weeks are the “meat’ of your TSP. This is when you should have implemented your proposed transition support strategy for the target group of students you identified in weeks 1 and 2.
Instructions:
Provide a summary of the TSP implementation. This narrative should provide the reader an understanding of how the plan was specifically implemented, how it was received by students, and any adjustments that needed to be made during the implementation period. This section should also include an Impact Analysis in which the student describes how a broader implementation of the TSP could impact the school and the community.
This component must be a minimum of 3 pages typed, double spaced in length.
Submission Instructions:
The assignment must be submitted via the appropriate link in Module 6 on the course Canvas page by Sunday at 11:59 CST of this week.
Mississippi College students are expected to be honest. Dishonesty, such as cheating or plagiarism, or furnishing false information, including forgery, alteration or misuse of University documents, records or identification, will be regarded as a serious offense subject to severe penalty, including, but not limited to, loss of credit and possible dismissal. Please read MC’s University Policy 2.19 below for specific information regarding penalties associated with dishonest behavior at Mississippi College. https://www.mc.edu/faculty-staff/application/files-archive/8313/8999/6222/A_-_2.19_-__Academic_Affairs_-_Policy_-_Academic_Honesty.pdf
*NO LATE WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED EXCEPT DUE TO UNAVOIDABLE CIRCUMSTANCES AS DEEMED BY THE PROFESSOR.
REFERENCES
Polloway, E., Patton, J., Serna, L., & Bailey, J. (2017).Strategies for Teaching Learners with Special Needs (Eleventh Edition).Pearson Publishers
RUBRIC
PWS (TSP) – Implementation of Plan Criteria Ratings Pts
Implementation of Plan
view longer description
3 pts
Exceeds Standard
The plan is clearly communicated, with significant detail and includes how the plan was received by students and if any adjustments were warranted. The impact analysis is included, and has a well-aligned connection between the plan and broader scale implementation. The analysis includes a graphical representation.
2 pts
Meets Standard
The plan is clearly communicated, with sufficient detail and includes how the plan was received by students and if any adjustments were warranted. The impact analysis is included, and has a connection between the plan and broader scale implementation.
1 pts
Needs Improvement
The plan is generally communicated, but lacks sufficient detail or does not include how the plan was received by students or if any adjustments were warranted. The impact analysis is included, but there is minimal connection between the plan and broader scale implementation.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The plan is not clearly communicated so that the reader has a clear understanding of how the plan was implemented. There is no impact analysis.
/ 3 pts
Total Points: 0
[ad_2]
Testimonials
