- In the Discussion on Making All Things Equal, Chuang-Tzu argues that once one understands the Way, then one can respond endlessly to life. Part of this understanding requires us to see life as a play of interdependent opposites in a never-ending cycle of change (pp. 39-40).
In light of this view of life, and claims like: There is nothing that is not so, nothing that is not acceptable, can Chuang-Tzus philosophy offer a robust response to injustice, such as racism, sexism, wealth inequality, tyranny, etc., so as to right the wrongs (p. 40)?
Or, does Chuang-Tzus philosophy instead require that we understand right and wrong as interdependent, and thus, that we passively accept such injustice, and simply let it be (p. 38)?
Testimonials
Write an argumentative analysis on Chuang-Tzu essay Discussion on Making All Things Equal