[ad_1]

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACES) SCREENING

In recent years, increased attention has been given to screening children and adolescents for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). ACEs include growing up in homes involving violence, abuse, neglect, mental health or substance abuse issues, parental separation, or incarceration. Researchers have found that ACEs negatively impact mental and physical health in adulthood and can limit life opportunities (CDC, 2020). Through screening, social workers can identify these experiences in a child’s life and then consider methods to prevent or mitigate the negative effects. Some screening tools have even been expanded to include related life events that contribute to toxic stress, in order to get a broader picture of a child’s experiences.

For this Assignment, you act as a social worker screening Juan Hernandez Jr. for ACEs and related life events. You then consider what you learned from the screening and how you would work with the family.

Reference:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, April 3). Adverse childhood experiences (ACES). https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/index.html

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE:

  • Review the Learning Resources on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).
  • Review the Hernandez family case in the “Social Work Case Studies” interactive media.
  • Download the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life Events Screener and use it to complete this Assignment.

BY DAY 7

Complete the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life Events Screener for Juan Jr.

Then, in a 1- to 2-page paper, analyze what you learned from the assessment and how you might use it in practice. In your paper, address the following:

  • What plans would you make for working with this family based on the identified ACEs?
  • How would you administer the ACEs assessment in this case or other cases involving young children?

Please use the Learning Resources or other scholarly resources to support your analysis.

 

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

REFERENCES

 

MEDIA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rubric

SOCW_6200_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

SOCW_6200_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life Events Screener for the case study: … Analyze what you learned from the assessment and how you might use it in practice.
18 to >16.02 pts

Exceeds Expectation

Response meets expectations and expands upon the analysis by drawing multiple (three or more) and/or varied connections between the assessment and the case study. … Response provides specific and/or added examples for how learning from the assessment can be applied in practice.

16.02 to >14.22 pts

Meets Expectation

Response clearly analyzes learning from the ACEs assessment, connecting one or two relevant aspects of the assessment with the case study. … Response explains how learning from the assessment can be applied in practice.

14.22 to >12.42 pts

Fair

Response attempts to analyze learning from the ACEs assessment but with only vague or less developed connections to aspects of the assessment and/or the case study. … Response identifies ways in which learning from the assessment can be applied in practice but does not elaborate or demonstrate application.

12.42 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Response fails to or does not attempt to analyze learning from the ACEs assessment and/or the case study. … Response does not attempt to apply concepts to practice.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat plans would you make for working with this family based on the identified ACEs?
18 to >16.02 pts

Exceeds Expectation

Response meets expectations and expands with well-developed connections between the plan and the identified ACEs. … Two or more scholarly resources are used to support the plan.

16.02 to >14.22 pts

Meets Expectation

Response provides a plan for working with the family that is based on the identified ACEs. … At least one scholarly resource is used to support the plan.

14.22 to >12.42 pts

Fair

Response provides a plan for working with the family, but its connection to the identified ACEs is vague, or the plan lacks specificity. … Only non-scholarly resources are used to support the plan.

12.42 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The response fails to provide a plan for working with the family and/or lacks any connection to the identified ACEs. … No resources are used to support the response.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHow would you administer the ACEs assessment in this case or other cases involving young children?
15 to >13.35 pts

Exceeds Expectation

Response meets expectations and provides specific and/or added examples to describe ACEs administration. At least two scholarly resources are used to support the response.

13.35 to >11.85 pts

Meets Expectation

Response describes how the student would administer the ACEs assessment in this case or other cases involving young children, using examples from the course case study or other cases. At least one scholarly resource is used to support the response.

11.85 to >10.35 pts

Fair

Response description is vague or limited and/or only addresses how to administer the ACEs assessment without connection to the case study. … Only non-scholarly resources are used to support the plan.

10.35 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Response makes little or no attempt to describe how to administer the ACEs assessment. … No resources are used to support the response.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
9 to >8.01 pts

Exceeds Expectation

Paper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas. … Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or less quotes. … Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

8.01 to >7.11 pts

Meets Expectation

Paper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas. … Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. … Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

7.11 to >6.21 pts

Fair

Paper does not meet length requirements either somewhat too short or too long. The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (five to 10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. … Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. … Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6.21 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Paper does not meet length requirements either significantly too short or too long. The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus. … Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more quotes) or three or more long quotes (over 40 words), and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. … Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

9 pts
Total Points: 60

PreviousNext

 

[ad_2]

Testimonials

6200 WK3 ASGN
We have updated our contact contact information. Text Us Or WhatsApp Us+1-(309) 295-6991