[ad_1]
Group Chapter Presentation – EDG 7692C Dr. Iuspa
| Criteria | 8 – 7 Points | 6 – 5 Points | 4-3 Points | 2-1 Points | Points Earned |
| Content (8 points out of 16) | Gives very specific information and summary of the main ideas of the chapter (s). Clearly illustrates critical and reflective/analytical thinking (addresses relationship between the idea to Politics of Curriculum and/or practice).
Well thought out/analytical response and illustrates more than two specific current examples related to the topic being discussed. |
Contains specific information and summary of the main ideas of the chapter (s). Is relatively detailed. Shows some critical/analytical and reflective thinking (addresses some relationship between the idea to Politics of Curriculum and/or practice).
Relatively well thought out and analytical response, illustrates two or one specific current examples related to the topic being discussed |
Has some specific information and summary of the chapter (s). Not detailed.
Poorly thought out and analytical response. Poorly attempts to identify one specific current example related to the topic being discussed. |
Is vague and does not address all assignment components. No evidence of having given the assignment real thought. | |
| Criteria | 4 – 3 Points | 2Points | 1 Points | 0 Points | |
| Chapter Presentation Design (4 points out of 16) | Group members were highly effective in designing/writing the presentation to explain the presentation’s main purpose.
Writing demonstrated a strong writing style basically free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, or usage errors; well-edited. |
Group members were somewhat effective in designing/writing the presentation to explain the presentation’s main purpose.
Writing demonstrated a writing style basically free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, or usage errors; well-edited. |
Group members were partially effective in designing/writing the presentation to explain the presentation’s main purpose; Average/poor writing style with frequent errors in spelling,grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or formatting errors; no editing apparent. | Group members were not effective at all in designing/writing the presentation to explain the presentation’s main purpose.
Writing demonstrated below than average writing style with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or usage; |
| minimal editing apparent | |||||
| Presentation to the class (4 points out of 15) | Execution is excellent. Reads easily and promotes in depth analysis of the content being presented. The audio (if applicable) is clear and effectively assists in communicating the main idea.
Background audio is kept in balance (if applicable). Presentation is very engaging and group members promote active group discussions by responding to ALL classmates’ postings/questions |
Well executed. Reads easily and promotes fairly well analysis of the content being presented.
Presentation is somewhat engaging and promotes somewhat group discussions. The audio is clear and assists in communicating the main idea. Group members respond to 75% of classmates’ postings/questions. |
Execution is poor. Hard to read and promotes poorly analysis of the content being presented.
Presentation is poorly engaging and promotes poor group discussions. The audio is inconsistent in clarity (too loud/too soft/garbled) at times and/or the background audio overpowers the primary audio. Group members respond to 50% of classmates’ postings/questions. |
Very difficult to read and analysis of the content being presented is not evident.
Presentation is not engaging and promotes no group discussions. The audio is cut- off and inconsistent or overpowering. Group members respond to less than 50% of classmates’ postings/questions |
|
| Total Points |
[ad_2]
Testimonials
