|
Evaluation
Categories
|
Criteria
|
|
| I. Organization |
Strong
15
|
Proficient
12
|
Satisfactory
10
|
Weak
7
|
Unacceptable
0
|
Score |
| |
Format of presentation is
appropriate. enhances the quality of the presentation, and is visually appealing. The information is presented in a logical sequence and has a nice flow. Sources are
appropriately cited throughout the presentation.
|
Format of presentation is appropriate and is visually appealing. The information is presented in a logical sequence. Sources are appropriately cited throughout the presentation. |
Format of presentation is appropriate but lacks visual appeal. The
information is presented in a fairly logical
sequence. Sources are cited throughout the
presentation with less than a few errors.
|
Format of presentation isn’t completely
appropriate for the task. The information isn’t presented in a logical sequence. Sources are not consistently cited
throughout the
presentation and have errors.
|
Format of presentation isn’t appropriate. The information isn’t
presented in a logical sequence. Sources are not cited.
|
|
| II. Content |
Strong
45
|
Proficient
39
|
Satisfactory
35
|
Weak
29
|
Unacceptable
0
|
Score |
| |
Introduction is attention-grabbing and succinctly summarizes the topic and establishes a clear framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate information is represented and is relevant to the topic. There is a clear conclusion to the
presentation that summarizes main ideas.
|
Introduction summarizes the topic and establishes a
framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate
information is represented and is relevant to the topic. There is a clear conclusion to the
presentation.
|
Introduction briefly
summarizes the topic but doesn’t elaborate on a framework for the rest of the presentation. Accurate information is represented and is typically relevant to the topic. There is a
conclusion to the
presentation.
|
Introduction somewhat summarizes the topic but doesn’t elaborate on a framework for the rest of the presentation. Mostly accurate information is represented but some information is not
relevant to the topic.
There is not a clear
conclusion to the
presentation.
|
Introduction doesn’t summarize the topic clearly and doesn’t
elaborate on a framework for the rest of the
presentation. Information is not accurate and lacks relevancy to the topic. There is no conclusion to the presentation.
|
|
| III. Presentation |
Strong
40
|
Proficient
34
|
Satisfactory
30
|
Weak
27
|
Unacceptable
0
|
Score |
| |
Speaker maintains eye contact and is engaged and animated during the presentation. The speaker has a clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the presentation meets requirements. |
Speaker maintains eye contact and is relatively animated during the presentation. The speaker has a clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the
presentation meets
requirements.
|
Speaker has infrequent eye contact with the
audience and has
moments of animation and engagement, although not consistent. The
speaker has a relatively clear and audible voice and maintains a good pace. The length of the presentation meets
requirements.
|
Speaker lacks eye contact with the audience.
Speaker doesn’t seem engaged and isn’t
animated during the
presentation. The speaker has a relatively clear and audible voice but doesn’t
keep a good pace. The length of the presentation does not meet
requirements.
|
Speaker lacks eye
contact with the
audience. Speaker isn’t engaged and isn’t
animated during the presentation. The speaker does not have a clear and audible voice and doesn’t keep a good pace. The length of the presentation does not meet
requirements.
|
|
| Additional Comments: |
Your total score
( Total Rubric: 100
points )
|
