[ad_1]
For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words. Use in-text citations accordingly. Use scholarly reference(s) along with the one(s) attached as well. Use and cite references using APA 7th Style Guide accordingly. Doctoral level class.
DQ 1) A gap exists between cognitive and behavioral psychology because cognitive theorists maintain that our approach to behavioral change rests solely in the way we think about the behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the cognitive theorists? Support your position. Can the gap between cognitive and behavioral psychology be bridged? Why or why not?
DQ 2) Might a cognitive-affective processing system provide a more thorough understanding of an individual’s personality than older models (e.g. Freud’s theory of personality)? Why or why not? Support your view with relevant current research.
Reference:
The Neurobiology of Emotion-Cognition Interactions: Fundamental Questions and Strategies for Future Research
Read: Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman. A. J. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions: Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1-4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00058
https://eds-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=0652b8f5-a42e-44d4-8928-52d24fd48af6%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d
Tutorial: Cognitive Psychology as a Radical Behaviorist Views It Read: Moore, J. (2013). Tutorial: Cognitive psychology as a radical behaviorist views it. The Psychological Record, 63(3), 667-680.
https://web-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=55749764-2ec0-4bfd-aa06-0695ecd97544%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=89562035&db=bth
A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure Read: Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.
https://web-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=e3b83396-7b96-49ff-976f-3b56a9b6456b%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=1995-25136-001&db=pdh
[ad_2]
Testimonials
