[ad_1]
Paper Assignment Guidelines
The goal of the four paper assignments you will write this semester is to strengthen your library skills, critical thinking and analytical skills, and knowledge of the key issues within the developmental psychology literature. Responses to each paper assignment should not be based on your opinion but based on the information in your textbook and peer-reviewed research. Each paper assignment should be 4 pages long, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman Font and in APA Format (abstract is not necessary). Up to 10 additional points will be deducted from papers that are not in APA formatting and/or have grammatical errors that affect readability. In addition to any sources that are provided within the paper assignment, for each assignment you will be responsible for finding three additional peer-reviewed sources to help you develop and support your response. When writing your paper assignments, please remember that your point of view should be informed and supported by peer-reviewed research. To receive credit for your work please provide a reference page in APA format for all the sources you used in your paper assignment. The reference page does not count toward the page requirement for paper assignments. To assist you in writing your paper assignments, please review the ‘Paper Assignment Help’ pdf file on Canvas and the grading rubric that is posted on Canvas and found at the end of the instructions for each paper assignment (the rubric is the same for all paper assignments).
Note:All paper assignments that you complete in this course will be processed using the anti-plagiarism software, UniCheck. This software is integrated with Canvas and will give you a similarity score for your assignments that will be visible to both you and your professor. If there are instances where your writing is similar to, or matches against, a source within the database, it will be flag for your professor to review. Any work that is submitted that has a similarity score over 25% will not be graded and will receive a zero. You can see your similarity score as soon as you submit your assignment. In the event that your similarity score is too high, you may revise your document and resubmit your assignment up until the assignment is due.
Paper Assignment #3(50 pts)
Gender and Age Roles in Magazine Advertisements
In this project, you will investigate gender and age stereotypes in magazines. Look at two widely circulated magazines and evaluate how ads depict males and females of various ages (adolescence, early, middle, and late adulthood). You should evaluate physical appearance, personality, and behaviors as they are depicted in the magazine ads. You can use the attached data sheet to help organize your impressions. After completing the data collection, write a brief report that answers the following questions. Make sure to include a literature review concerning the importance of media influencing gender stereotypes.
- Are all age groups represented in advertisements?
- Who is underrepresented and overrepresented? Why do you think that is so?
- Compare the various groups in terms of the characteristics you observed portrayed for each in the advertisements. What generalizations about age and gender do these portrayals convey?
- Compare your findings between the different magazines. Are your findings similar or different?
- What do you conclude if they are similar? Different?
- If they are different, do the differences sensibly relate to differences in the apparent purpose or style of the magazines?
Data Sheet for Gender and Age Roles in Magazine Advertisements
Magazine Title _________________ Issue date ________ Number of Ads _____
ADOLESCENTS: BOYS GIRLS
Physical appearance:
Body message:
Clothes:
Facial expressions:
Personality:
Intelligence:
Activities:
Verbal comments:
Sexuality:
Other:
YOUNG ADULTS: MEN WOMEN
Physical appearance:
Body message:
Clothes:
Facial expressions:
Personality:
Intelligence:
Activities:
Verbal comments:
Sexuality:
Other:
MIDDLE ADULTS: MEN WOMEN
Physical appearance:
Body message:
Clothes:
Facial expressions:
Personality:
Intelligence:
Activities:
Verbal comments:
Sexuality:
Other:
ELDERLY ADULTS: MEN WOMEN
Physical appearance:
Body message:
Clothes:
Facial expressions:
Personality:
Intelligence:
Activities:
Verbal comments:
Sexuality:
Other:
Paper Assignment Rubric
Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.
| Excellent | Good | Okay | Needs Improvement | |
|
Explanationofissues
(5 pts) |
Issue/problemtobeconsideredcriticallyisstatedclearlyanddescribedcomprehensively, deliveringallrelevantinformationnecessaryforfullunderstanding. (5 pts) | Issue/problem tobeconsideredcriticallyisstated, described,andclarifiedsothatunderstandingisnotseriouslyimpededbyomissions. (4 pts) | Issue/problem tobeconsideredcriticallyisstatedbutdescriptionleavessometermsundefined, ambiguitiesunexplored, boundariesundetermined, and/orbackgroundsunknown. (3 pts) | Issue/problemtobeconsideredcriticallyisstatedwithoutclarificationordescription. (2 pts) |
|
Evidence
(10 pts) Selectingandusinginformationtoinvestigate a pointofvieworconclusion |
Demonstratesskillfuluseofhigh-quality, peer-reviewed, relevantsourcestodevelopideaswithenoughinterpretation/evaluationtodevelop a comprehensiveanalysisof the issue. Viewpointsofexpertsarequestionedthoroughly. (10 pts)
|
Demonstratesconsistentuseofpeer-reviewed, relevantsourcestosupportideaswithenoughinterpretation/evaluationtodevelop a coherentanalysis. Viewpointsofexpertsaresubjecttoquestioning. (8 pts)
|
Demonstratesanattempttousecredibleand/orrelevantsourcestosupportideaswithsomeinterpretation/evaluation, butnotenoughtodevelop a coherentanalysis.Viewpointsofexpertsaretakenasmostlyfact, withlittlequestioning. (6 pts) | Demonstratesanattempttousesourcestosupportideasinthewriting.Information istakenfromsource(s) withoutanyinterpretation/evaluation.
Viewpointsofexpertsaretakenasfact, withoutquestion. (4 pts) |
|
Sources
(5 pts) |
Number of required peer-reviewed sources is met (5 pts) | Missing one required peer-reviewed source. (4 pts) | Missing two required peer-reviewed sources. (3 pts) | Missing more than three peer-reviewed sources. (2 pts) |
|
Influenceofcontextandassumptions
(10 pts)
|
Thoroughly (systematicallyandmethodically) analyzesownandothers’ assumptionsandcarefullyevaluatestherelevanceofcontextswhenpresenting a position. (10 pts) | Identifiesownandothers’ assumptionsandseveralrelevantcontextswhenpresenting a position. (8 pts) | Questionssomeassumptions. Identifiesseveralrelevantcontextswhenpresenting a position. Maybemoreawareofothers’ assumptionsthanone’sown (orviceversa). (6 pts) | Showsanemergingawarenessofpresentassumptions (sometimeslabelsassertionsasassumptions).Beginstoidentifysomecontextswhenpresenting a position. (4 pts) |
|
Student’sposition—perspective, thesis/hypothesis
(10 pts) |
Specificposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) isimaginative, takingintoaccountthecomplexitiesofanissue.
Limitsofposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) areacknowledged. Others’ pointsofviewaresynthesizedwithinposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (10 pts) |
Specificposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takesintoaccountthecomplexitiesofanissue.Others’ pointsofviewareacknowledgedwithinposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (8 pts) | Specificposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledgesdifferentsidesofanissue. (6 pts) | Specificposition (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) isstated, butissimplisticandobvious. (4 pts) |
|
Conclusionsandrelatedoutcomes—implicationsandconsequences
(10 pts) |
Conclusionsandrelatedoutcomes (consequencesandimplications) arelogicalandreflectstudent’sinformedevaluationandabilitytoplaceevidenceandperspectivesdiscussedinpriorityorder. (10 pts) | Conclusionislogicallytiedto a rangeofinformation, includingopposingviewpoints; relatedoutcomes (consequencesandimplications) areidentifiedclearly. (8 pts) | Conclusionislogicallytiedtoinformation (becauseinformationischosentofitthedesiredconclusion); somerelatedoutcomes (consequencesandimplications) areidentifiedclearly. (6 pts) | Conclusionisinconsistentlytiedtosomeoftheinformationdiscussed; relatedoutcomes (consequencesandimplications) areoversimplified. (4 pts) |
[ad_2]
Testimonials
