[ad_1]
Project Preparation: Identification of Sources
Precious Teasley
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP 630-Q4555: Healthcare Finance and Reimbursement 23TW4
Professor: Dr. Arsenault
April 14, 2023
Project Preparation: Identification of Sources
Revenue Cycle Process | |
Reference One | |
Matson, E. (2018). Give Your Revenue Cycle a Clean Bill of Health. Healthcare Financial Management, 72(9), 20-21. | Relevance: The article is relevant to the subject since it focuses on issues impacting revenue cycles processes |
Credibility: It is credible because it is a peer-reviewed journal published in a reliable journal | |
Gap Assessment: The article does not provide conclusive recommendations on how the findings can be applied widely | |
Reference Two | |
Mackey, T. K., Kuo, T. T., Gummadi, B., Clauson, K. A., Church, G., Grishin, D., & Palombini, M. (2019). ‘Fit-for-purpose?’–challenges and opportunities for applications of blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1-17. | Relevance: The article focuses on the challenges and opportunities for revenue cycle improvement |
Credibility: Its findings are based on empirical findings and published in the reliable journal | |
Gap Assessment: While the source explains the challenges and opportunities, it does not base its findings on primary data. | |
Healthcare Reimbursement |
|
Resource One | |
Britton, J. R. (2015). Healthcare reimbursement and quality improvement: Integration using the electronic medical record: Comment on” fee-for-service payment- an evil practice that must be stamped out?”. International Journal of health policy and Management, 4(8), 549. | Relevance: Healthcare experts who understand healthcare dynamics did the study. Therefore, the findings are relevant to the subject. |
Credibility: Its findings are founded on empirical findings and published in the reliable journal | |
Gap Assessment: The article author only used secondary data to synthesize study findings. | |
Resource Two | |
Casto, A. B., & Forrestal, E. (2013). Principles of healthcare reimbursement (p. 371). American Health Information Management Association. | Relevance: The source explains the law and regulations that guide the work of people involved in reimbursement |
Credibility: The book was published by a group of professionals from a healthcare association | |
Gap Assessment: Since a group of professionals did the study from one discipline, the findings may not reflect the dynamics in the entire healthcare. | |
Strategic Planning |
|
Resource One | |
Ehrlich, H., McKenney, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2020). Strategic planning and recommendations for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of emergency medicine, 38(7), 1446. | Relevance: Provide health professionals and administrators with recommendations on strategic planning. |
Credibility: Its findings are based on empirical findings and published in the reliable journal | |
Gap Assessment: The study’s findings cannot be generalized because they provide a restricted working environment. | |
Resource Two | |
Hans, E. W., Van Houdenhoven, M., & Hulshof, P. J. (2011). A framework for healthcare planning and control. In Handbook of healthcare system scheduling (pp. 303-320). Boston, MA: Springer US. | Relevance: The article focuses on the challenges and opportunities for revenue cycle improvement |
Credibility: Healthcare experts who understand healthcare dynamics did the study. Therefore, the findings are relevant to the subject. | |
Gap Assessment: While the resource provides an important planning framework, the authors do not explain how the framework can benefit the organization. | |
Reimbursement Compliance |
|
Resource One | |
Degelsegger-Márquez, A., & Panteli, D. (2020). Towards reimbursement of mobile digital health applications? An international comparison of practices. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5), ckaa165-1327. | Relevance: The resource explains how people dealing with reimbursement can utilize technology to maintain best practices. |
Credibility: Its findings are based on empirical findings and published in the reliable journal | |
Gap Assessment: Since a group of professionals did the study from one discipline, it is possible that the findings do not reflect the dynamics in the entire healthcare. | |
Resource Two | |
Green, M. (2020). Understanding Health Insurance: A Guide to Billing and Reimbursement-2020. Cengage Learning. | Relevance: The study, rather than the guide, is based on the topic, which is helping the professional, understand principles that guide billing from a healthcare perspective. |
Credibility: Billing is an important aspect of reimbursement compliance. Therefore, the study’s findings are reliable and credible to the professionals in the field. | |
Gap Assessment: The book’s author only used secondary data to synthesize study findings. |
[ad_2]
Module 4 Project Prep