[ad_1]
Every professional should be able to clearly articulate his/her philosophy of working with children. Your philosophy statement communicates your beliefs about how children learn and grow, and explains your view of the teacher’s role. It should be grounded in professional standards and will probably be revised throughout your career.
In a job interview you will be asked to explain your philosophy of early childhood education. You need to be able to identify those elements that are most important to you and that define you as a teacher. For this assignment you are being asked to develop a written philosophy statement. This is a very personal statement that should reflect your own philosophy and beliefs as these beliefs will guide your actions in the classroom. You may turn it in early to have it reviewed.
Please follow these guidelines:
- The statement should be ½ to 1 page in length, and single spaced. However, please double space in-between each paragraph.
- Steps to take:
- Start with a rough draft. This is a copy that lets you get your thoughts on paper without worrying about spelling, grammar, or mechanics.
- Self-edit your paper. After you have composed your rough draft, go back and carefully read it at least two (2) times. Change parts that you think need to be revised.
- Partner check. After you have completed your self-edits, conference with a peer. Ask them to use proofreaders’ marks for their input. You do not have to submit these edits.
- Second draft. Using the feedback your partner provided, make corrections and changes as desired. Reread it, and revise it (several times) until it is well organized and flows well.
- Final Draft. Complete the version you want to submit for grading, attach the self-evaluation and grading rubric and submit the final draft by the due date.
- It must be carefully edited for clarity, spelling, and punctuation. Because your philosophy is going to represent you in the professional field, it should be a well written statement that not only reflects your beliefs and practices, but also is well written. It will be meticulously checked for errors. Since it will be graded very strictly, check for typos. Have at least 2 people proof read your paper. It is both a collegiate assignment and potential employment document. Do your best!
- Please select one of the following titles:
- My Role as an Early Childhood Educator
- or My Philosophy of Early Childhood Education
Revised Fall 2016
- Be sure to answer the following three (3) questions in your philosophy:
- How do you believe children learn? (What are your ideas about teaching and learning?)
- What are your goals for children?
- What do you see as being your role, as a teacher, in this process? Include your beliefs about your responsibilities to children, families, the community, and colleagues.
- Your philosophy should be separated into paragraphs, with each one having one particular focus. Clarity throughout your paper is important and paragraphs help the reader navigate through your paper.
- Avoid using the phrase “I love children” in your philosophy. Rather focus on “respect.” Also avoid using the slang term “kids.” Use the word “children.”
- Be sure to seek feedback from 1-2 people (fellow students, friends, mentors, etc.) and write their names below. This is valuable feedback and worth 10% of your grade (5 points).
- Please attach this entire handout (including the writing process check list and self-evaluation) to your philosophy.
Name_________________________________________
|
Date Completed | Signature of person/people who helped you complete this step | |
Rough Draft
|
|
(Optional space in case someone helped you edit your first paragraph) |
Rough Draft
(entire philosophy) |
Your initials:
|
|
Self -Edit | Your initials:
|
|
Partner Check
*Ask 1-2 people to read your philosophy and provide feedback. |
Partner Signature(s):
1. ————————————————- 2. |
|
Second Draft | Your initials:
|
|
Final Draft | Your initials:
|
|
Self-Evaluation
Name: _________________________________________
What do you think was the purpose of this assignment?
What did you learn through participating in this assignment?
What was the most valuable achievement(s) through doing this assignment?
What was your greatest strength(s) you brought to this assignment?
What was your greatest challenge you brought to this assignment?
How could this assignment be designed to better support your learning? What, if anything would you change about the assignment? Your honest feedback is appreciated.J
Based on the Rubric, how would you grade your work?
I feel that I earned ____________(out of 50) points on this assignment because….
DO NOT SUBMIT THIS GRADING RUBRIC.
THIS IS ONLY FOR YOUR KNOWLEDGE ON HOW YOU WILL BE GRADED.
Description |
45-50 points (A)
Exemplary |
40-44 (B) or 35-39 (C)
Satisfactory |
34 or less points
Unsatisfactory |
Comments |
Opening line or paragraph | Starts philosophy with a sentence(s) which grabs the reader’s attention. | Opens philosophy with an inviting sentence.
May need slight refining. |
Missing introductory statement/sentence. | |
Substance
Answers the 3 questions:
1. How do you believe children learn? 2.What are your goals for children? 3.What is your role, as a teacher, in this process? |
Writing is concise, logical
Clear evidence of answering all 3 questions and providing support for each of them.
Ideas are supported and elaborated. |
Writing is mostly clear and concise
Evidence of answering 3 questions, but parts might need further support or appear disjointed.
|
Effort to answer all 3 questions, but not complete
Answered 1-2 of the questions
Little or no effort to answer 3 questions
|
|
Closing line or paragraph |
Ends philosophy with a sentence(s) that ties the writing together. | Attempt to end philosophy with a closing statement, but needs refining. |
Missing closing sentence or statement. |
|
Length of Philosophy |
½ to ¾ page in length | ½ to ¾ page in length | Less than ½ page or more than 1 page in length | |
Format – 5points
(title/heading, introduction, writing, conclusion, font, margins, paragraphs, single spaced) |
Writing format meets standards.
Follows designated guidelines. |
Writing format meets standards.
Follows most guidelines. |
Writing format not to standard.
Does not follow guidelines. |
|
Spelling & Grammar
5 points (10% of grade) |
No significant errors |
Minor/A few errors |
Many errors
Difficult to read |
|
Writing Process Check list (10% of grade or 5 points of your grade)
(re: bottom of page 2) |
Completed all 6 steps.
Had 2 peers/partners provide feedback. |
Completed 5 steps.
Had 1 peer/partner provide feedback. |
Completed less than 5 steps. Did not seek feedback from peers. | |
Clarity |
Clear and original.
Major ideas are clear and well supported. Language is clear and precise. |
Mostly clear writing. |
Little or no
originality or clarity Major ideas are not clear. Difficult to read |
|
Self-Evaluation (10% of grade/5 points)
|
Wrote in complete
sentences Answered with details Submitted on time |
Provided brief explanations
Few details |
Incomplete sentences
Incomplete or missing form |
[ad_2]