Rubric

Grading Rubric
Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
First Classmate’s Critique

Did you comment on an adequate number of these elements in your peer’s essay:
1. Thesis and 2-4 point parallel preview (this should ideally be one sentence at the end of paragraph 1).
2. Does the thesis and preview fulfill the assignment’s prompt and requirements?
3. Topic Sentences: In the body paragraphs (2 3, etc.), do the the writers have topic sentences that not only introduce the topic but also allude to the thesis? If not, help them.
4. Support: Compliment the writer’s support.
a. What are a few specific examples, stories, or details that you really liked? Were there any that fell short or need more explanation?
b. Were there enough examples and stories with concrete detail, dialog, senses (smell, taste, feel, sound, look], similes/metaphors)? Are there any specific details you can suggest they add?
c. Word Choice: Is there slang, too many simple words, too many obtuse words?). Can you recommend any specific words to replace others?
5. Organization: How did they organize their essay? Does it work well or could you suggest a different organization?
6. Do they use transitions between examples and between supporting paragraphs? Are there areas they could use more?
7. Sentences: Do they vary their sentence lengths. In other words, do they have sentence variety? You don’t want every sentence to have the boring order: subject, verb, object; occasionally start a sentence with an adverb or a prepositional phrase (Laboriously. . .); occasionally start a sentence with a past participle (Eaten. . .) or an "ing" (Walking. . . ); occasionally start a sentence with the object of the sentence first (like Yoda). . .; occasionally start a sentence with . subordinating conjunction (Because, If, When, etc.), and so on.
8. You’re welcome to make comments and corrections on the essay if you’d like to, but it’s not required.
9. If you chose the option to write your peer a paragraph about these strengths, was the paragraph 250-words?
10.If there were a lot of clarity issues, did you identify a few typos or errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax (this means word placement). You don’t have to fix their whole essay. Just let them know if you found any run-ons, fragments, etc.
11. Were you kind and yet honest in the way you articulate your suggestions? When there’s no verbal tone of voice, feelings can get hurt easier.

10 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks
10 pts
Second Classmate’s Critique

Did you comment on an adequate number of these elements in your peer’s essay:
1. Thesis and 2-4 point parallel preview (this should ideally be one sentence at the end of paragraph 1).
2. Does the thesis and preview fulfill the assignment’s prompt and requirements?
3. Topic Sentences: In the body paragraphs (2 3, etc.), do the the writers have topic sentences that not only introduce the topic but also allude to the thesis? If not, help them.
4. Support: Compliment the writer’s support.
a. What are a few specific examples, stories, or details that you really liked? Were there any that fell short or need more explanation?
b. Were there enough examples and stories with concrete detail, dialog, senses (smell, taste, feel, sound, look], similes/metaphors)? Are there any specific details you can suggest they add?
c. Word Choice: Is there slang, too many simple words, too many obtuse words?). Can you recommend any specific words to replace others?
5. Organization: How did they organize their essay? Does it work well or could you suggest a different organization?
6. Do they use transitions between examples and between supporting paragraphs? Are there areas they could use more?
7. Sentences: Do they vary their sentence lengths. In other words, do they have sentence variety? You don’t want every sentence to have the boring order: subject, verb, object; occasionally start a sentence with an adverb or a prepositional phrase (Laboriously. . .); occasionally start a sentence with a past participle (Eaten. . .) or an "ing" (Walking. . . ); occasionally start a sentence with the object of the sentence first (like Yoda). . .; occasionally start a sentence with . subordinating conjunction (Because, If, When, etc.), and so on.
8. You’re welcome to make comments and corrections on the essay if you’d like to, but it’s not required.
9. If you chose the option to write your peer a paragraph about these strengths, was the paragraph 250-words?
10.If there were a lot of clarity issues, did you identify a few typos or errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax (this means word placement). You don’t have to fix their whole essay. Just let them know if you found any run-ons, fragments, etc.
11. Were you kind and yet honest in the way you articulate your suggestions? When there’s no verbal tone of voice, feelings can get hurt easier.

Testimonials

Peer Editing Assignment for Essay 2’s Rough Draft
We have updated our contact contact information. Text Us Or WhatsApp Us+1-(309) 295-6991